Here I am, at the stroke of midnight, on Christmas day, not in some fancy pubs getting drunk and silly; but dutifully at the keyboards, striking furiously away.
How is that for a start into one of the most celebrated holidays in the world?
My agenda for the morning would still be within the boundaries of the house. Effectively I am/going through the housewife training phase, so if you can excuse me for not being out of the house.
Jokes aside, I do have some program lined up. A bunch of friends will be coming over for brunch. But expect not that the Editor would be up to his neck or apron (whatever) sweating out in front of the wok this time. My culinary skills are meant for suitable for my own stomach acids. I would not guarantee the palate will go down well with those of my guests.
===
Outstanding news worthy issues accumulated from weeks ago:
"Why cant maids have boyfriends?" (ST Dec 9 2005)
"A maid-to-order society won't do" (ST Dec 9 2005)
"Let's talk about MARRIAGE" (ST Dec 12 2005)
"No more passing the buck please" (ST Dec 2005)
"China plays down impact of GDP revision" (ST Dec 21 2005)
===
The first two topics went around that of the employed maid in SG. I believe that there had been enough cases of both good and bad maids and employers to justify some say.
The most crucial point raised was that giving a rest day to the maid. Under the state current employment laws, every salaried employee in SG gets an off day for certain days at work. But in retrospect, apart from the good, caring employers, there is a general consensus among maid employers not to give their employee a day off. And the mindset of some employers go as far as to push the maids to a 18-hr working schedule; two or more families to tend to; their carwasher; their babysitter and what-nots all rolled into one.
Put yourself in such shoes, would you, for a meagre 250 SGD (on average) work hard if you have known what could befall upon you?
Taking those cases where the maids were abused and underfeed, there would be a greater proportion of maids who are basically become "slaves" while engaged as maids.
It takes two to clap; both employers and maids mindsets have to change before we see improvements in the treatment of our maids.
Though we are considered First World country, but sadly, our attitudes and mindsets are still very much Third World.
===
In "Let's talk about MARRIAGE", the young generation pour forth their feelings into words and looking from a marco-view, one would not be blame if one deems these articles are childish.
Quote "Why lead a married life fraught with financial worries if it means giving up the carefree life of a bachelor?
Until this problem is addressed, many would rightfully defer marriage because it risks lowering their quality of life." Unquote
I found it amusing especially when the writer expressed 'it risks lowering their quality of life'
He must be very thorough in risk assessment, for not, the expression would have not been sprouted.
Everything in life is a risk. Even crossing at the green man does not necessarily equates you being safe. It merely enhances that the fact you can cross safely, much more than you cross when the red man is on. Is it not?
Quote "Singaporeans choose the second course of action - outsourcing. And so Junior goes to childcare and families employ maids. And a car becomes an attractive option." Unquote
No one, not even salvation from above or elsewhere could save you unless you and your other half decide what is the true meaning of prudence. One does not indulge in a lavish lifestyle when they could not afford to.
This is where the couple comes into the picture to 'iron out the differences' and this is what makes up part and parcel of marriage - Communications.
===
Lastly the two articles came out the day after the much-debated NKF report from KMPG was made public.
"No more passing the buck please" (ST Dec 2005)
"China plays down impact of GDP revision" (ST Dec 21 2005)
In view of all that have been said about corporate goverance, I hold my peace, since it was never my forte anyway. I have only but superficial knowledge on such issues.
Some good came out of it though. An overblown ego finally blown itself out, so to say. IF not for the deframation suit against SPH and the reporter, the skeletons would have been still be hiding behind the closets.
Enough said and enough ranting of who's who to blame and so forth. Finger-pointing after the milk is spilled does help but then the mess has to be cleaned up.
At least some parts of the government branches have 'woken' up after their prolonged slumber. With such frenzy being set off, I believe there are many others who would have come to terms that the long arm of the law DOES catch up. That said, it also proves that nothing, not even the most perfect system is infalliable.
As for figures and results, we have known since the days of statistics have shown, are uttery rubbish when one have an ulterior motive for abusing them.
We can proclaim that we have a 12-inch penis, or bosoms the size of watermelons as long as we grab the attention of our targeted group. Point taken.
As said in the fields of unit trusts and share-trading grounds, "
Caveat Emptor."
What is said, needs not necessarily be deemed true.
===
So much for this Christmas Editioral. This is your Editor, wishing all readers and loved ones out there, Merry Christmas.